[Members] Voting criteria
halr9000 at gmail.com
Thu May 12 12:21:56 CDT 2005
> > XMPP compliant anymore, many abandoned, many commercial but there is none
> > that integrates into OS very well.
> What do you mean exactly by integrates into the OS very well?
That would be the job of the JSF to document something that we can all
agree on. Integration would mean totally different things for each of
the three main platforms.
> > about the "default" XMPP OS integration. In example any webbrowser starts
> > up
> > the default email client when someone clicks on the mailto: link in a
> > webpage.
> There is already a standard that handles this, the jabber URI standard that
> Peter has been working on.
Correct. So we just ensure that that RFC is included in our basic
level of certification.
@Pater, what's the status of this anyway?
> The sort of level of integration microsoft can achieve into windows is
> something we are very unlikely to be able to ever achieve since we do not
> have the source code for windows, or office or any of the things they are
> integrating with.
I think there is always plenty of room for improvement. No need to
take a pessimist stance on it, just copy what MSN does for starters.
> It would be interesting to know what sort of levels of integration and types
> of integration you are expecting, as things like MSN messenger do not really
> integrate that much into the OS at the moment, the main things ive noticed
> are the things in hotmail and office (but that is windows messenger not MSN
I think this is out of scope for this conversation. Someone needs to
draft a document to detail this (one for windows, mac, linux) and we
go from there.
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:hal at jabber.rocks.cc
More information about the Members