[Members] Voting criteria
halr9000 at gmail.com
Thu May 12 15:52:16 CDT 2005
> >> Now does that make any sense at all? I don't understand your point
> >> Richard.
> > And I dont understand yours, what has trying to force someone to include
> > your code in theirs go anything to do with the discussion at hand???
> I think that he wants to say that a official JSF projects (server and
> clients) will make no sense. Lots of developers wants to see their code
Not quite. My sarcasm (which might've been lost) was in response to
> "Official JSF Software", which is a bad thing unless everyone
> has the opportunity to obtain such a title
I feel that everyone does NOT deserve the title inherently. Richard
thinks that everyone SHOULD be able to attain it. So to address that
I propose we have two measurements. Certification, which all may
attain  and "Official JSF" which only the best can attain.
Compliance and "Best" would be measured by us, the JSF Members. Well
now that I think about it, the Council would want to have some level
of oversight for "Official JSF Software". We would recommend, they
 All who are XMPP compliant by a certain date, see my other email.
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:hal at jabber.rocks.cc
More information about the Members