jabberfoundation at ralphm.ik.nu
Mon Aug 21 02:14:31 CDT 2006
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:25:03AM +0100, Ian Paterson wrote:
> Ian wrote:
> >The "Standards Track" label already differentiates those protocols that
> >are likely to be of general use.
> Actually it doesn't. So maybe we need another type for "niche" Standards
> Track JEPs?
I think this is why we made up our protocol suites. We should give those
more attention and make those very visible at xmpp.org. How the rest of
the JEPs are organised or named has less significance, then, I think.
More information about the Members