[Members] Re: s/JSF/XSF/g
jadestorm at nc.rr.com
Mon Nov 20 13:44:50 CST 2006
On Nov 20, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Sean Egan wrote:
> On 11/20/06, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
>> If that's not specific enough we can also do something like OpenChat.
>> That's probably already trademarked or something, though...
> I was waiting for someone to propose something with "free" or "open"
> in the name. I think that, while those words mean a whole lot to *us*,
> they're irrelevent to most people, and should be avoided.
I'll shut up now. ;)
Now while I don't think open means a whole lot to most people, I'm
not sure I agree that free doesn't. Free typically means ... doesn't
cost anything, which often gets people's eye. =) (none-the-less, I
really don't like any of the combos of free and some other word, but
At the very tip of my tongue I have something that I want to suggest
that I think would be good but I can't get it the rest of the way
out. Been like that for the past couple of days. If I can put it
into works, I'll type it out.
I still prefer to come up with something that's not so bland.
Something that is easy to say but has a cuteness to it. Maybe even
something that encompasses it being focused on the entire world
instead of .. like -america- online and such. EarthChat/EarthTalk!
Obviously I've got nothing solid yet.. =/
More information about the Members