[Members] Re: s/JSF/XSF/g

[Daniel Henninger]

On Nov 20, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Sean Egan wrote:

> On 11/20/06, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
>> If that's not specific enough we can also do something like OpenChat.
>> That's probably already trademarked or something, though...
>
> I was waiting for someone to propose something with "free" or "open"
> in the name. I think that, while those words mean a whole lot to *us*,
> they're irrelevent to most people, and should be avoided.

HotSexyChat2006?  =)

I'll shut up now.  ;)

Now while I don't think open means a whole lot to most people, I'm  
not sure I agree that free doesn't.  Free typically means ... doesn't  
cost anything, which often gets people's eye.  =)  (none-the-less, I  
really don't like any of the combos of free and some other word, but  
hey)

At the very tip of my tongue I have something that I want to suggest  
that I think would be good but I can't get it the rest of the way  
out.  Been like that for the past couple of days.  If I can put it  
into works, I'll type it out.

I still prefer to come up with something that's not so bland.   
Something that is easy to say but has a cuteness to it.  Maybe even  
something that encompasses it being focused on the entire world  
instead of .. like -america- online and such.  EarthChat/EarthTalk!   
(*duck*)

Obviously I've got nothing solid yet..  =/

Daniel