matt at jivesoftware.com
Tue Sep 12 02:01:58 CDT 2006
Good points, but we're also a fairly smart group. Hopefully we all got
it right the first time or pinged PSA to reset our votes. I for one
voted for Remko. :)
Like you and Chris, I think a web-based voting system would be just
> -----Original Message-----
> From: members-bounces at jabber.org
> [mailto:members-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Smith
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:55 PM
> To: JSF members discussion list
> Subject: Re: [Members] Memberbot
> On 12 Sep 2006, at 00:16, Chris Mullins wrote:
> >>> Existing software is the way to go...
> >> I think the question of allowing the voting over XMPP is a
> large part
> >> of the voting process.
> > Sure, from a protocol purists point of view, it would be
> nice - but I
> > would much rather see our effort directed toward other things.
> > Building
> > a vote-taking bot is only useful 4 times per yet. Many
> other project
> > the JSF considers are, I think, considerably more beneficial.
> I think the most important thing is getting a system that's
> fair. At the moment the memberbot method is horribly horribly
> biased towards the first five candidates: despite being one
> of the very strongest candidates, I'd be very suprised if
> Remko (the last candidate,
> alphabetically) manages to get a fair proportion of
> votes...my suspicion is that the new council will be four of
> the first five candidates, arranged alphabetically, plus PSA,
> who is something of a special case.
> So whether we move to a web system, which I have no great
> objection to, or we make a new memberbot, which I've
> indicated to PSA I'm willing to have a look at, I think we
> quite desperately need to implement a fairer system (simply
> randomising the order of candidates would penalise all
> candidates equally, which is good enough at this stage, I think).
> Kevin Smith, PhD Student, Computer Science, Exeter University
> Psi XMPP client project leader - http://psi-im.org
More information about the Members