[Members] Open Talk / Open Chat
jsf at edwinm.ik.nu
Wed Jan 24 04:54:51 CST 2007
Ralph Meijer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 13:09 -0800, Sean Egan wrote:
>> On 1/22/07, Jean-Louis Seguineau <jean-louis.seguineau at laposte.net>
>> Already taken by http://www.cross-talk.com/ ;)
>> It has two trademarks registered too, but the closest is for "Hands
>> free cellular phone speaker system with microphone for in-vehicle
>> use." It's a shame, I really like the name. The closest I can think of
>> off the top of my head is "Intertalk," and that obviously lacks the
>> same ring. Maybe "Throughtalk"? Bah.
>> Open Talk is actually pretty good, although I'm not sure it drives the
>> "one service can talk to another" concept as well.
> I severely dislike 'Open'. The prefix is often misused, usually for
> closed systems / technologies.
I agree with Ralphm. My first thought when I read Open Talk were about
groups like "The Open Group" / OSF, who weren't open at all...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Members