[Members] XSF membership: what does it mean?

Nicolas Vérité nicolas.verite at gmail.com
Wed Nov 5 07:13:41 CST 2008


Legal stuff aside for the organization, for an individual, membership
is a vote, a commitment, a duty, and confidence given to the
organization.

Thus a member could discuss ideas, constructively criticize, perform
actions, act locally, promote... maybe a little more than non-members.

And the organization could provide gifts like T-shirts and stickers,
or hotel when meeting (like it has already been done)...

Nÿco

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> Daniel Henninger didn't re-apply for XSF membership:
>
> http://blathersource.org/blog/archives/75-Why-I-left-the-XSF.html
>
> I've been commenting at his post, as have a few others.
>
> The basic confusion is that some folks expect XSF membership to mean
> something -- as in, we have some deeply meaningful conversations on this
> list, plot out the future of XMPP technologies, etc.
>
> By contrast, I see the membership as something we need in order to
> maintain the XSF as a legal entity. We are a non-profit corporation
> that's defined as a membership organization, so we need members. But we
> don't limit participation to members (or employees of sponsoring
> companies), as too many closed industry consortia do. Instead, all of
> our important work takes place on open mailing lists, chatrooms, and
> sometimes IRL at the XMPP Summit meetings.
>
> Because XSF members don't really do much *as members*, some people get
> confused. Why isn't there any conversation on the members at xmpp.org list?
> Where is the secret handshake? Etc. But that's not the point of being an
> XSF member.
>
> We could change that. We could ask XSF members to get more heavily
> involved in website development, running the jabber.org service, doing
> interop testing, marketing, and so on. That would be great, if people
> are interested. But I don't see a strong reason to limit things so that
> only XSF members can help with any of those tasks.
>
> Folks here may disagree with this approach, which would be fine with me.
> After all, agreement is overrated. :)
>
> What do you think?
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>



-- 
Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:nicolas.verite at gmail.com
Jabber ID : xmpp:nyco at jabber.fr
http://linuxfr.org/ - http://fr.wikipedia.org/ -
http://www.jabberfr.org/ - http://qsos.org/


More information about the Members mailing list