[Members] XSF membership: what does it mean?
melo at simplicidade.org
Wed Nov 5 11:45:29 CST 2008
On Nov 5, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> I agree that having someone to look over it isn't bad. But I think
> there should also be a WG which does the main work on the XEP, and
> then the Council only has a quick view on it.
Isn't that what the per-topic mailing lists are for?
I always assumed that they where for that.
> Am 05.11.2008 um 18:22 schrieb Dave Cridland:
>> This isn't limited to specifications which are under active
>> scrutiny, too - we've a lot of specs, some of them largely
>> untouched for years, and updating or polishing those is a mammoth
> That's just another thing I don't like: Why is an untouched XEP bad?
> It isn't necessarily bad, so why automatically regard it as
> deferred? Maybe it's just not used yet? And deferrig it definitely
> won't change that.
Deferred only applies to Experimental XEP's. After you reach Draft,
Active or Final, you don't need to touch the XEP.
I expect that people with Experimental XEPs will have interest on
pushing it to the next step....
XMPP ID: melo at simplicidade.org
More information about the Members