[Members] order of candidates

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Brendan Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:53:08PM -0700, Matt Tucker wrote:
>> There is actual value to seniority after all. :)
> 
> Sure, but that value should presumably be assessed by the voters. Making
> the most senior people first on the list (or last, for that matter) just
> seems to invite laziness and stagnation.
> 
> If this is really an issue then randomly ordered would be best. I don't
> know how feasible that is.

It's not feasible given our current tools.

Peter

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20080902/51c2a2b9/attachment.bin