[Members] team leads

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Tue Dec 1 16:41:05 CST 2009

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> That doesn't seem unreasonable - the other option that springs to mind
>> would be to s/board/members/, but it doesn't seem unreasonable for
>> board to choose this.
> Another option: no leads. :) The (informal) infrastructure team has
> never had a team lead, and seems to function just with with rough
> consensus and running code...

Well, it's not got a formal lead, but it's always had one person who
decides who is on the team - who gets root on which machines, etc.
Particularly for iteam, I think this is vaguely important - if the
review team sends a bad review it's a little less troublesome than if
someone 'cat /dev/urandom > /dev/sda1's on athena.


More information about the Members mailing list