[Members] minutes of XSF Annual Meeting, 2009-10-06

Nathan Fritz nathanfritz at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 03:56:57 CDT 2009

2009/10/7 Mickaël Rémond <mickael.remond at process-one.net>:
> Hello,
> Le 7 oct. 2009 à 10:25, Remko Tronçon <remko at el-tramo.be> a écrit :
>>> I feel that the XSF should go toward a more neutral, more open and more
>>> professional approach
>> Not commenting on the XSF's direction, I don't understand why one
>> would run for a position, and then afterwards claim that one wasn't
>> interested or believed in it anyway. That feels like mocking the XSF
>> members' judgement and trust, and doesn't help their credibility in
>> the future.
> I do not understand the connection between the two parts of your sentence. I
> think it was clear from my mail that I ran again because I wanted to defend
> my position once more.
> I thought however that the way this went for the election result confirmed
> my feeling that my previous attempts would fail again this year and that it
> was more usefull to express my opinion on this occasion.
> This is the exact flame I was expecting but I do not see how my credibility
> is affected, on the contrary.

Remko was not flaming you. "Their credibility" was a reference to "The
XSF's credibility."

> Anyway, I express myself on my feeling and what I think should be improved
> in the organisation. I did not made any personal attack. I felt I am partly
> responsible of the situation having been in the board last year.
> Now please stop reacting by making personal attack. I am just trying to
> help.
> --
> Mickaël Rémond

More information about the Members mailing list