[Members] Metaproposals 3 and 4 - Council Candidate Limitations and Appointment Appeals

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Oct 8 09:11:56 CDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/8/09 7:56 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:

> (Let me make clear: I wasn't asking for the limit against Isode, your
> work is well appreciated and we know that it is value you give for
> free to the community as many of us do, but in principle I think that
> it is dangerous that one single company can take the total lead of
> protocol like XMPP with very little effort, and this is not just for
> fear of evil, but more simply for lack of scope or different goals;
> luckily for me the problem is over since the veto thing gives enough
> protection)

Well, I must say it's great that finally people don't think Jabber.com
is the Evil Company That Controls XMPP. This is a sign that we have made
true progress as a technology community. ;-)

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrN8ysACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzL9wCg0h1/y/kUx7w6CFFhE+on+PFl
hzkAoLEXCgCLOudE+Hrp9wTKlMzZe449
=JlGV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Members mailing list