stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Oct 9 09:09:50 CDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/9/09 2:28 AM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 19:53, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 10/8/09 9:04 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>> On Thu Oct 8 15:26:09 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> 3. Spec Review. This team doesn't exist. Reviews happen haphazardly for
>>>> XEPs in the inbox, Last Call, Call for Experience, and the all-important
>>>> old specs that need to be maintained and updated. This team might also
>>>> review schemas and examples for accuracy, etc.
>>> I think we may need two of these - one focussed on technical review, and
>>> the one focussed on proof reading, and language.
>> The editing and proofreading could be done by the Communications Team,
>> leaving technical review for the Spec Review Team.
> Just let's get the work done first, then let's do the dubbing when
> it's working fine and is pérenne.
I agree on doing work, and I am not a big fan of formality, but if we
have defined ways for members to contribute (various teams) then it is
perhaps easier for us to define and assign various tasks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Members