[Members] teams

Nicolas Vérité nicolas.verite at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 09:44:53 CDT 2009

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 16:09, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On 10/9/09 2:28 AM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 19:53, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> On 10/8/09 9:04 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>>> On Thu Oct  8 15:26:09 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>>> 3. Spec Review. This team doesn't exist. Reviews happen haphazardly for
>>>>> XEPs in the inbox, Last Call, Call for Experience, and the all-important
>>>>> old specs that need to be maintained and updated. This team might also
>>>>> review schemas and examples for accuracy, etc.
>>>> I think we may need two of these - one focussed on technical review, and
>>>> the one focussed on proof reading, and language.
>>> The editing and proofreading could be done by the Communications Team,
>>> leaving technical review for the Spec Review Team.
>> Just let's get the work done first, then let's do the dubbing when
>> it's working fine and is pérenne.
> I agree on doing work, and I am not a big fan of formality, but if we
> have defined ways for members to contribute (various teams) then it is
> perhaps easier for us to define and assign various tasks.

In a community with volunteers, it might be better not write and assign tasks.

Usually, people come with what they want to do, do, and/or have done.

But a task tracker would be fine for me as well.
Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:nicolas.verite at gmail.com
Jabber ID : xmpp:nyco at jabber.fr
http://linuxfr.org/ - http://fr.wikipedia.org/ - http://www.jabberfr.org/
http://xmpp.org - http://april.org/  - http://qsos.org/

More information about the Members mailing list