[Members] [Fwd: [Operators] XMPP ICA update]
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Sep 9 11:07:42 CDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 9/9/09 10:04 AM, Arc Riley wrote:
> StarCom is, and has, offered class 1 certificates for free. These
> certificates only verify valid domain ownership, not the identity of the
> person or organization claiming to own it.
> So apparently they will just be expanding their free certificate
> offering from web and mail to xmpp as well.
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Nicolas Vérité
> <nicolas.verite at gmail.com <mailto:nicolas.verite at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Sorry, I don't undertand all the implications:
> Does this mean that the XSF will stop distributing free ICA? (I
> understand so)
> Will StarCom charge for their CA? (how much?)
Not for Class 1. If you want a Class 2 cert, you will need to provide
identity verification information. This might be required in order to
obtain a wildcard cert.
> Will the process be simplified for admins worlwide? (should we
> document more/better?)
I think it will be simpler.
> I do understand that we still encourage other CA to do XMPP also:
> Have you heard of such CA?
> (will there be real competition?)
I sure hope so.
> And last but not least:
> Can we draw figures of self-signed certificates before, and really
> ICA/CA signed after, in order to compare and have an idea of the
> success of this operation? (even simple figures, personnal estimations
> with 50% error would fit)
That sounds like a lot of work, especially because we never did any
surveys of deployment before the XMPP ICA was started.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Members