[Members] XEP maintenance

Matthew Wild mwild1 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 14:23:12 CST 2010


On 17 February 2010 20:13, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> On 2/17/10 12:10 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 17 February 2010 18:51, bear <bear42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> are you interested in trying to use something like Crucible (an
>>> Atlassian product that enables code reviews) for this?
>>>
>>> I thought about it last night - each XEP would be in the code
>>> repository and edits would get commited and then the reviewers would
>>> use Crucible to markup and comment on the changes - once approved the
>>> XEP would then be tagged to represent the current version.
>>>
>>> too complex?
>>
>> It feels too much like cathedral building to me. I have also never
>> been a fan of Crucible, Fisheye, or well any of the Atlassian products
>> with (in my opinion) over-complicated UIs.
>>
>> But this is just me, and I'm curious to know what other people think too.
>
> I'm curious to know why every conversation quickly becomes a discussion
> about tools. :)
>

We're a fussy lot.

I'll use whatever is there and I won't complain if it works, I
promise. I just don't have good experiences, that's all. Then there's
this whole open-source vs commercial thing, but I won't even go there
:)

Matthew


More information about the Members mailing list