[Members] XEP maintenance
bear42 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 14:54:04 CST 2010
I just wanted to bring up the idea - not worried if people want to
keep it human centric.
I use Crucible every day and it helps keep the tedium and drudgery out
of code review and thought it would make a good process.
Maybe I need to be more active in XEP maintainence in order to see if
it really is a good fit - after all, you can't automate something if
you don't know how it works :)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:23, Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 February 2010 20:13, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> On 2/17/10 12:10 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> On 17 February 2010 18:51, bear <bear42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> are you interested in trying to use something like Crucible (an
>>>> Atlassian product that enables code reviews) for this?
>>>> I thought about it last night - each XEP would be in the code
>>>> repository and edits would get commited and then the reviewers would
>>>> use Crucible to markup and comment on the changes - once approved the
>>>> XEP would then be tagged to represent the current version.
>>>> too complex?
>>> It feels too much like cathedral building to me. I have also never
>>> been a fan of Crucible, Fisheye, or well any of the Atlassian products
>>> with (in my opinion) over-complicated UIs.
>>> But this is just me, and I'm curious to know what other people think too.
>> I'm curious to know why every conversation quickly becomes a discussion
>> about tools. :)
> We're a fussy lot.
> I'll use whatever is there and I won't complain if it works, I
> promise. I just don't have good experiences, that's all. Then there's
> this whole open-source vs commercial thing, but I won't even go there
bear42 at gmail.com (xmpp, email)
bear at code-bear.com (xmpp, email)
PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
More information about the Members