[Members] XSF-sanctioned proxies.

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Oct 21 11:21:24 CST 2010

On 10/21/10 11:19 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Kevin Smith <kevin at kismith.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>>> On 9/7/10 4:20 AM, Alexander Gnauck wrote:
>>>> I really like this idea. And this will help us to move forward with
>>>> the file transfer problems. I have lots of support for file transfer
>>>> proxies, a public list of free proxies would help a lot.
>>>> I remember that we had a XML file with public servers for registration
>>>> (IBB) in the past which was very popular as well.
>>> Agreed.
>>> Sounds like an item for the infrastructure team. :)
>> Commteam, surely? These are public data, not infrastructure :)
> Well, I think it's a Board decision that the XSF wants to sanction the
> proxies first, in fact, given that we're advertising these as being
> safe proxies for sending your data through, probably without users
> realising.

OK, we'll ask the newly seated Board to put that on its agenda. :)


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20101021/dd6e2618/attachment.bin>

More information about the Members mailing list