dave at cridland.net
Mon Jul 25 16:00:21 UTC 2011
On Mon Jul 25 15:46:40 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 7/25/11 10:17 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > I've been asked today for someone I can recommend for consultancy,
> > again. As usual, my first step was to think of people I know whose
> > skills fit, and who might be available, and it got me thinking...
> > 1) We have lists for clients, servers, and libraries - should we
> > one for consultants, too?
> > 2) If we did, should this list be restricted to members who are
> > available for consultancy? (A perk of membership, if you like).
> I like perks of membership.
Well, I think we need to define more responsibilities to go along
with the perks, but yes, I think fundamentally I do as well.
> > 3) Or, should we have a directory of members, which could list
> people as
> > consultants, provide links to businesses and projects, as well as
> > providing contact details for members?
> Is there an implied XSF seal of approval regarding the persons
Only in as much as they're members.
> > (FWIW, this was also partly sparked by my realisation that
> although I've
> > an XSF group in my roster, it has only 35 people in, instead of
> Shared rosters!
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Members