[Members] Section 2.6 proposed change
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 17 08:16:21 CST 2011
On 3/17/11 5:12 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I'd like to propose a change to section 2.6, to make it more draconian.
> The problem is that because we typically have four meetings a year,
> missing only three of them essentially makes it very hard to drop off
> the membership, since you'll only have three meetings to miss prior to
> reapplication anyway.
> Therefore, my proposal is to change "three (3)" to "two (2)" in section
In security parlance, what's the attack here? I don't see a strong need
to tighten the requirements here, but I'm open to argument. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Members