[Members] Section 2.6 proposed change

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 17 08:16:21 CST 2011


On 3/17/11 5:12 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I'd like to propose a change to section 2.6, to make it more draconian.
> The problem is that because we typically have four meetings a year,
> missing only three of them essentially makes it very hard to drop off
> the membership, since you'll only have three meetings to miss prior to
> reapplication anyway.
> 
> Therefore, my proposal is to change "three (3)" to "two (2)" in section
> 2.6.

In security parlance, what's the attack here? I don't see a strong need
to tighten the requirements here, but I'm open to argument. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20110317/a27b0ffb/attachment.bin>


More information about the Members mailing list