[Members] Formalizing Informal Liaisons

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Nov 27 13:26:59 UTC 2013

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Joachim Lindborg <joachim.lindborg at sust.se
> wrote:

> That sounds ok for me. The liaison teams then report to board and
> discussions are to be backfed to the XSF list when needed.
I'd assume that in most informal cases, it'd be straight back to the list.

> Will that imply that people leaving or joining the teams, must be
> validated through the board or just taken in the teams, again adding
> bureaucracy
That's a good point. The reasoning behind involving the Board is that
because these people would be acting with the backing of the XSF, they're
essentially representing it. I'd hope that ratification of nominations,
despite being a really impressive-sounding thing, would be a matter of a
simple rubber-stamp in the vats majority of cases.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20131127/87d358a8/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Members mailing list