[Members] Feedback on votes

Steffen Larsen zooldk at gmail.com
Tue May 10 18:16:25 UTC 2016


> On 10 May 2016, at 18:48, Joachim Lindborg <joachim.lindborg at sust.se> wrote:
> I also try to see contributions and participation possibilities and have had internal doughts on when to say no an tend to go more for yes. 
> I'm myself not skilled enough to participate in the in debt technical discussions on standardslist. It's hard to find the participation "proofs" outside the maillists 
> Most of my voting is solely based on the applications on the wiki.
> Regards
> Joachim Lindborg
> CTO, systems architect
> Sustainable Innovation  SUST.se <http://sust.se/>
> Barnhusgatan 3 111 23 Stockholm
> Email: Joachim.lindborg at sust.se <mailto:Joachim.lindborg at sust.se>
> linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/joachimlindborg <http://www.linkedin.com/in/joachimlindborg>
> Tel +46 706-442270
> 2016-05-10 13:15 GMT+02:00 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im <mailto:stpeter at stpeter.im>>:
> On 5/10/16 5:28 AM, Guus der Kinderen wrote:
> Hi all,
> Happy to be a new XSF member! My membership application was accepted in
> the last voting round, where I did get some "no" votes. The anonymous
> voting does currently not leave any room for feedback (other than "no"),
> which will pretty much make it impossible to identify, let alone
> address, the issues that some have. Can we build in a mechanism that
> allows for an optional, anonymous text that accompanies a vote? I think
> that this would add value to the voting process.
> Great idea. I don't think we've open-sourced the voting bot yet, but if we did so pull requests would be welcome. ;-) Then we'd need to figure out what to do with that feedback - provide it privately to each candidate, I suppose...
> Peter

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20160510/d9fd142c/attachment.html>

More information about the Members mailing list