[Members] Publishing Non-Open-Standard Specifications
winfried at tilanus.com
Fri Jan 17 11:44:33 UTC 2020
On 1/16/20 6:42 PM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
> I don't see why a standards body should put their specs under the same
> roof as historical documentation of protocols that happened to be used
> in the wild. It becomes hard to make a distinction what is an
> open/endorsed standard and what not.
Any solution that doesn't make a very clear distinction between XSF
mandated open protocols and descriptions of non-open defacto standards,
renders my lobby for XMPP as mandatory standard useless.
privacy strategist & privacy architect
More information about the Members