[Members] For the interoperability of the Web's giants: an open letter - La Quadrature Du Net

Maxime Buquet pep at bouah.net
Wed Jul 1 15:06:29 UTC 2020


On 2020/06/29, Maxime Buquet wrote:
> On 2020/06/29, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > I should make it clear that (a) is something I would expect many reasonable
> > people to disagree with - I think there are many cases where
> > legislative intervention is the most appropriate way of changing market
> > pressures to gain a result that would otherwise not occur, I'm just not
> > convinced this is one of them.
> 
> Indeed. I replied to this above.
> 
> > In any case, if a bunch of people wanted to put together a political
> > campaigning organisation, I would absolutely not argue against it, and
> > (depending on the choices made) I might even join it. But turning the XSF
> > into one seems like a potentially risky development.
> 
> I personally don't see the risk you are talking about, but there might
> be other interests involved in this discussion that I am not aware of
> and thus I am not considering them.

I wanted to add that the mission statement agrees with me that the
mission of the XSF is to (help) build [a] decentralized infrastructure.

Where is neutrality in this?


[0]: https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/mission.html

-- 
Maxime “pep” Buquet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20200701/35fe0eaf/attachment.sig>


More information about the Members mailing list