[standards-jig] Developmen Standards
iainshigeoka at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 14 16:07:04 UTC 2001
At 11:12 AM 8/14/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Most of it has seemed fine to me so far, I'm going to go back and read
>them all again today. Overall it does seem rather quiet on the list....
Yeah. I noticed that. Is most of Jabber students on summer vacation?
> >>Operational integrity of software is up to the individual developer or
> >>company. Effort should be made on the part of the developer to create
> >>software that conforms across all relevant protocol categories and across
> >>all operating environments. Effort should be made on the part of the
I liked most of the document. I am a bit worried about "across all
relevant protocol categories". Do we have "protocol categories"? I
certainly think it might be useful to have protocol categories (perhaps
along the lines of J2ME's configurations and profiles... say a full client,
PDA, mobile device (phone), etc). However, it is a bit confusing right now
to need to conform to relevant protocol categories when we don't know what
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Standards