[standards-jig] Developmen Standards

Julian Missig julian at jabber.org
Tue Aug 14 21:40:48 UTC 2001


"protocol category" can be taken to mean namespace, which we most certainly
do have plenty of. As was discussed earlier, compliance will be based upon
the namespaces (or in the case of jabber:client, pieces of the namespace)
which a particular jabber "thing" conforms to.

Julian

----- Original Message -----
>From: "Iain Shigeoka" <iainshigeoka at yahoo.com>
To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 August, 2001 12:07
Subject: RE: [standards-jig] Developmen Standards


> At 11:12 AM 8/14/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>
> >Most of it has seemed fine to me so far, I'm going to go back and read
> >them all again today.  Overall it does seem rather quiet on the list....
>
> Yeah.  I noticed that.  Is most of Jabber students on summer vacation?
>
> > >>Operational integrity of software is up to the individual developer or
> > >>company.  Effort should be made on the part of the developer to create
> > >>software that conforms across all relevant protocol categories and
across
> > >>all operating environments.  Effort should be made on the part of the
>
> I liked most of the document.  I am a bit worried about "across all
> relevant protocol categories".  Do we have "protocol categories"?  I
> certainly think it might be useful to have protocol categories (perhaps
> along the lines of J2ME's configurations and profiles... say a full
client,
> PDA, mobile device (phone), etc).  However, it is a bit confusing right
now
> to need to conform to relevant protocol categories when we don't know what
> those are...
>
> -iain
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>




More information about the Standards mailing list