[standards-jig] Re: [JDEV] Internationalization
max at quendi.de
Mon Nov 5 00:03:00 UTC 2001
At 16:52 Uhr -0700 04.11.2001, David Waite wrote:
>For things like the groupchat protocol though, messages such as
>"User foo has entered" are a closed set - they can be defined fully
>in the protocol specification, and represented exclusively by XML.
Sure, that is true. I was not thinking of this special case when I
wrote my mail.
> This is what I did for my conferencing proposal;
>- if support for a particular feature is required for entering a
>room, all responses, errors and events are defined in XML
>- if support for a particular feature is optional, yet it still
>generates side-effects, the client will receive both an XML
>description of the event and english text describing the event. This
>means a user only sees english text if it does not support a feature
>of the remote server. An example of this would be 'kicking' someone
>from the room - you get a message saying they have been removed from
>the room in XML format, and get it in plaintext format as well, so
>that users who are using clients which do not understand removal
>notifications still get a message which explains that the fellow
>didn't quite leave on their own accord.
>- locale information is not sent to users within the room, just
>because I haven't figured out a use for it yet.
I don't see one, either, but then this doesn't mean there is none :)
I say let's wait if somebody complains then it can still be added, as
long as we define a safe & sane default for the absence of xml:lang.
So is there already anything implementing that new new conferencing protocol?
email: <mailto:max at quendi.de>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890
More information about the Standards