[standards-jig] Standards cleanup...

Julian Missig julian at jabber.org
Sat Oct 6 02:34:47 UTC 2001

Well, DJ Adams has been working on the template for the official Jabber 
Standards docs, that's what the whole jabber:x:event deal is. We'll soon 
have some sort of CVS access set up and divide up the namespaces, so we 
can get some decent docs out there. The idea is that we can take the 
existing information and add to it to create these official docs.

So... you can help by seeing when/if the CVS access will be set up and 
then actually documentating the various namespaces of Jabber.


Scott Cote wrote:

> This is exactly what I had hoped the foundation in general and the
> standards JIG specifically would do. I deeply belive that this is
> key to the wider acceptance of Jabber. Please let me know if I
> can be of help.
> -Scott
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Iain Shigeoka" <iainshigeoka at yahoo.com>
> To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [standards-jig] Standards cleanup...
>>At 02:10 PM 10/5/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>>>What do you mean by "Jabber specifications"?  The protocol itself?
>>>That's what the Foundation JIGs are created to do.
>>Yes.  The protocol docs.  This particular JIG (standards-jig) is supposed
>>to work on cleaning things up and create compliance tests or other
> criteria
>>we can use to judge things like the "powered by jabber" logo
>>qualifications, and possible jabber "enviroments" where we define levels
> or
>>types of compliance similar to Java 2 Micro Edition (j2me) use of
>>configurations and profiles...
>>If you try and implement a jabber client and server with the current
>>protocol docs (not looking at jabberd/jabelin) you cannot.  The current
>>docs are not complete and are ambiguous in many places.  This is a natural
>>result of a protocol being developed in parallel with the implementation,
>>with the implementation being the ultimate authority on what is and what
> is
>>not "Jabber".  Things have gotten stable enough (at least in the core
>>protocols) that it should be worthwhile to sit down and get the specs
> right.
>>It will also be useful in the creation of jabelin... we need to separate
>>the implementation from the specification.  That way, it will be possible
>>to create a "clean room" jabber server or client from the specs.  This
>>should be very good for the jabber community as new jabber servers and
>>clients are written.  We will have a set of core standards and tests to
>>keep things interoperable.
>>So the task and my offer is not to write now specs, or change existing
>>ones.  I would like to actually just nail down what is Jabber today.  The
>>other foundation JIG's will then make changes to the existing standards,
> or
>>suggest new ones...
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list