[standards-jig] Digital ID support in Vista
theo at theoretic.com
Wed Apr 10 05:00:27 UTC 2002
>> Why didn't you use the existing method?
> If you mean the PGP security, that would not work for us. We wanted the
> Presence to be signed with a Digital Certificate that was signed by a
> Certifying Authority.
> As far as I know, the PGP security does not have Certifiying Authorities
> structure in place like Versign, etc.
Nope, it doesn't.
>>Why didn't you wait until we've formalized on something new and accepted?
> There was a discussion on this topic on this list and the consensus seemed
> to be that we need to understand more on this topic. The only way to
> understand more is to get feedback from a project in the real world. We
> expect customers will tell us what's right and what's wrong. And we will
> provide this feedback to Jabber community.
> Once we have an official standard for Digital IDs in place, Vista will
> support it.
Yep, Good move, IMO. :-)
/\ Adam Theo, Age 22, Tallahassee FL USA
//\\ Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
// \\ (Boycotting AOL, therefore no AIM or ICQ)
=//====\\= Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
// || \\ "Bringing Ideas Together"
|| Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
|| "The Coolest IM on the Planet"
|| "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American
|| Buddhist Political Philosopher."
More information about the Standards