[standards-jig] Checking for implementations

Adam Theo theo at theoretic.com
Tue Apr 16 18:51:32 UTC 2002


DJ Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:51:02PM -0400, Adam Theo wrote:
> 
>>Hm, not sure I fully understand your point. I agree, yes, that trying to 
>>list the implimentations of the current spec is a lost cause and a bad 
>>way of making a decision. But this just seems like a trivial issue.
> 
> 
> :-)
> 
> Well, that was the point, really, but I don't think it's trivial, if 
> decisions about what to do about changing existing specifications is
> being disussed. The point really is that the world of implementation
> isn't just the off-the-shelf programs and libraries, it's an unknown
> quantity of private code that uses these libraries to get things done.

Oh, haha. OK. Sorry about that, then ;-)
-- 
     /\  Adam Theo, Age 22, Tallahassee FL USA
    //\\   Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
   //  \\  (Boycotting AOL, therefore no AIM or ICQ)
=//====\\=  Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
//  ||  \\     "Bringing Ideas Together"
     ||      Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
     ||         "The Coolest IM on the Planet"
     ||  "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American
     ||      Buddhist Political Philosopher."




More information about the Standards mailing list