[standards-jig] Checking for implementations

DJ Adams dj.adams at pobox.com
Wed Apr 17 07:11:31 UTC 2002

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:45:25PM -0600, David Waite wrote:
> Of course, I make no secret that I dislike browse. It is directory 
> services and pub/sub and introspection (and even feature negotiation, by 
> some people's definition) all rolled into a tiny ball. I've always 

I love the picture that this description conjures up :-)

> I dunno - I really need feedback from the people on this jig :-) I know 
> which way _I_ want to vote, but it really matters more what the users of 
> the system want - and because browse was written before there was a 

Well, I personally would prefer browse to remain as it is, as for me 
at least (I can only speak for myself) it seems to be flexible enough.
That doesn't preclude a parallel investigation into / development of
a new angle, however. 


More information about the Standards mailing list