[standards-jig] Checking for implementations

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Apr 23 15:51:29 UTC 2002


That sounds agreeable to me.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, David Sutton wrote:

> Hello,
> 
>    i'd suggest something more like 'exp:x:NameSpace' or 
> 'exp:iq:NameSpace' - simply changing 'jabber' to something experimental 
> sounding, as its then easy to change once approved. Just picking up on a 
> niggling point :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    David
> ---
> David Sutton / Peregrine
> 
> --- Included Message ---
> David Waite wrote:
> > James Widman wrote:
> > 
> >> How is it that these implementations started using 'jabber:iq:browse' 
> >> without the council approving JEP 0011 first? 
> > 
> > 
> > Browse was "proposed" and implemented before the JSF existed.
> > 
> >>
> >> In the future, should implementations based on not-yet-approved JEPs 
> >> use a namespace like 'exp:myNiftyNamespace' or 
> >> 'jabber:exp:myNiftyNamespace'?
> > 
> > 
> > I sure hope so.
> > 
> > -David Waite
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 




More information about the Standards mailing list