[standards-jig] Checking for implementations

David Waite mass at akuma.org
Tue Apr 23 17:41:37 UTC 2002


There's no reason we have to limit ourselves to a jabber-style URI - it 
can be a real URL to a web site for information on the protocol being used.

-David Waite

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

>That sounds agreeable to me.
>
>Peter
>
>--
>Peter Saint-Andre
>email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
>weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
>
>On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, David Sutton wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>   i'd suggest something more like 'exp:x:NameSpace' or 
>>'exp:iq:NameSpace' - simply changing 'jabber' to something experimental 
>>sounding, as its then easy to change once approved. Just picking up on a 
>>niggling point :)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>   David
>>---
>>David Sutton / Peregrine
>>
>>--- Included Message ---
>>David Waite wrote:
>>
>>>James Widman wrote:
>>>
>>>>How is it that these implementations started using 'jabber:iq:browse' 
>>>>without the council approving JEP 0011 first? 
>>>>
>>>
>>>Browse was "proposed" and implemented before the JSF existed.
>>>
>>>>In the future, should implementations based on not-yet-approved JEPs 
>>>>use a namespace like 'exp:myNiftyNamespace' or 
>>>>'jabber:exp:myNiftyNamespace'?
>>>>
>>>
>>>I sure hope so.
>>>
>>>-David Waite
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Standards-JIG mailing list
>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>






More information about the Standards mailing list