[standards-jig] JIDs (JEP-0029)

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Mon Apr 29 16:53:34 UTC 2002


Craig,

I would personally like to see a note about why we want to limit
resources to 256 bytes.  Is there a solid technical reason?  Also, why
256 bytes?  Would it also be more beneficial to replace all references
to bytes with characters, since we should not be speaking in storage
sizes.

--temas


On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 11:00, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Craig Kaes has submitted a JEP that seeks to fully define what a Jabber
> Identifier is. Note that this JEP includes changes to some of the current
> (implementation-specific) features of JIDs, such as the fact that right
> now there is no limit on the length of a resource. You can review the JEP
> here:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0029.html
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig





More information about the Standards mailing list