[standards-jig] JEP-0001 suggested change (sort of)
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Aug 1 21:07:56 UTC 2002
Actually just updated the DTD and added <strong> to the XSLT to supplement
the previous inclusion of <em>.
Jabber Software Foundation
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> It's possible I have not kept the DTD up to date with the XSLT and
> evolved JEP practice, will check into that tonight.
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Russell Davis wrote:
> > while there is discussion about making modifications to jep-0001 with
> > regard to no anonymous authorship and voting procedures etc. could there
> > also be a change to the actual jep.dtd as well please?
> > I really don't care what is used whether it is italics, bold, animated
> > gifs or dancing lightbulbs but some method of enhancing parts of the
> > text other than the existing methods would be useful. Iknow that people
> > could go crazy and make a document virtually unreadable but when used
> > judiciously it would certainly improve the overall look and readability
> > of a jep.
> > bst rgrds
> > Russell Davis
> > jid: ukscone at jabber.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards