[standards-jig] JEP-0001 suggested change (sort of)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Aug 1 21:07:56 UTC 2002


Actually just updated the DTD and added <strong> to the XSLT to supplement
the previous inclusion of <em>.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> It's possible I have not kept the DTD up to date with the XSLT and
> evolved JEP practice, will check into that tonight.
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation
> http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> 
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Russell Davis wrote:
> 
> > while there is discussion about making modifications to jep-0001 with 
> > regard to no anonymous authorship and voting procedures etc. could there 
> > also be a change to the actual jep.dtd as well please?
> > 
> > I really don't care what is used whether it is italics, bold, animated 
> > gifs or dancing lightbulbs but some method of enhancing parts of the 
> > text other than the existing methods would be useful. Iknow that people 
> > could go crazy and make a document virtually unreadable but when used 
> > judiciously it would certainly improve the overall look and readability 
> > of a jep.
> > 
> > 
> > bst rgrds
> > Russell Davis
> > jid: ukscone at jabber.org
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 




More information about the Standards mailing list