dizzyd at jabber.org
Wed Aug 7 17:19:38 UTC 2002
On Wednesday, August 7, 2002, at 12:03 , Iain Shigeoka wrote:
> I'll chime in with another +1 to punt to JNG.
> Namespaces are definitely something we need to do right (thanks for
> it up yet again Diz... We need it done.). However, its ugly ugly ugly
> the current Jabber setup. I hate to punt to JNG again but IMO this is
> to break the "simple for client developer" promise too. Perhaps the
> namespaces deadline should be a JNG deadline?
Nooo! :) Namespaces are not _that_ bad to do correctly. Does it require
work? Yes. Is it all easy? Probably not. But, given the ever moving date
of JNG, I'm strongly against chucking "namespace correctness" into that
More information about the Standards