[standards-jig] JNG Ramblings.
temas at box5.net
Thu Aug 8 17:04:10 UTC 2002
On the framing part, have you ever looked at AOL's OSCAR protocol? It's
actually rather nifty. It's composed of a primary wrapper/header they
call a SNAC. It defines a family and data type (kind of like namespaces
in our world). The SNAC is composed of many TLV's (type, length, value)
sets. Which is why I thought of it while looking at your stuff. I need
to digest the rest more, but it definately made me think of OSCAR.
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 10:12, Mike Lin wrote:
> hi all
> i've been coding these past few days on some JNG prototypes. nothing is
> done yet, but to help get the juices flowing i wrote down some of the
> things i'm aiming to do.
> most of the stuff i've done thusfar relates to the transport layer, and
> thus slips underneath adam's core tool protocols ideas, although i'm
> beginning to touch on them near the end.
> anyway, i'm just hoping to help get some conversations started. as the
> <h3> at the top clearly states, this should not be taken seriously. it
> is not proven to work by any stretch of the imagination. i'm doing some
> very fluid experimentation in coding it up, and i'll keep things updated
> with my experiences.
> i'm not trying to get everyone to drop everything and switch over to
> JNG. i just think we need to start thinking about it more formally.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards