[standards-jig] Invisibility Support in Jabber

Adam Theo theo at theoretic.com
Fri Aug 9 03:38:45 UTC 2002


That would be very awesome, and would make alot of sense for an evolving 
protocol designed through trial and error like Jabber. Thanks temas!

Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> I would say for this type of change you would submit the JEP as a new
> revision and it would go through the process.  I've actually been
> working on some notes for JEP-1 that state we approve a JEP revision,
> not the JEP itself.  That way we can't just make edits and have them
> active.

-- 
     /\  Adam Theo, Age 23, Tallahassee FL USA
    //\\   Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
   //  \\  Pager: (850) 709 7738
=//====\\=
//  ||  \\  Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
     ||         "Building Ideas by Bringing them Together"
     ||      Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
     ||         "The Next Generation Communications Protocol"
     ||  "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American Buddhist"




More information about the Standards mailing list