[standards-jig] JEP-0030 (Disco): Categories "application" and "user"
theo at theoretic.com
Tue Dec 10 21:18:31 UTC 2002
Sounds reasonable to me. I'm just now only concerned about Disco itself,
to make sure it has the support of the people here on the list. But
since it seems alot of the opposition to it has been resolved or died
down, I guess it is safe to go on to the Council?
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Basically requests should be sent to the JEP Editor for now, or discussed
> on the list here if you feel that is necessary first. If that becomes too
> burdensome on this list, we may set up a separate list (jana at jabber.org).
> If that becomes too burdensome on the JEP Editor, we may set up a panel of
> people to handle JANA requests. But the feeling of the Council was that we
> don't need to define more process than necessary, at least initially.
> Sound good?
/\ Adam Theo, Age 23, Tallahassee FL USA
//\\ Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
// \\ Cell: (850) 567 1138
// || \\ Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
|| "Building Ideas by Bringing them Together"
|| Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
|| "The Next Generation Communications Protocol"
|| "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American Buddhist"
More information about the Standards