[standards-jig] Pondering DTCP

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Thu Dec 12 23:12:25 UTC 2002


What do you mean by "socket matching"?  I don't see that phrase used
elsewhere.

--temas


On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 02:36:12PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Thursday 12 December 2002 01:00 pm, Dave Smith wrote:
> > As noted previously the request/response/ack is a byproduct of blindly
> > creating connections -- let's not force HTTP to fit in the box called
> > DTCP. DTCP is not a standard and there is no reason for us to assume at
> > this point that we can't find a better way to do things.
> 
> As the author of the JEP, I came up with a set of requirements and wrote a 
> spec to solve them.  I'm open to changing the handshake protocol, but not at 
> the expense of functionality.  If temas has different requirements, as I know 
> you seem to, then that is a different discussion.
> 
> Assuming our requirements are the same, what I would like to see is an example 
> of using HTTP to do the socket matching.
> 
> -Justin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20021212/e67e6b13/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list