[standards-jig] DTCP again

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Fri Dec 13 16:27:59 UTC 2002


> DTCP is at Last Call stage because a couple of people proposed it as
> such. That does _not_ mean it _should_ be at Last Call stage -- indeed,
> I would argue that the barrier to "Last Call" should be significantly
> higher. There is at least as many people opposed to DTCP as there are
> for it -- maybe more.

Then maybe the threshold defined in JEP1 should really be calculated like
this:

number for - number against >= 5% of the membership

not

number for >= 5% of the membership

What does everyone think? This could stop JEPs being sent to last call when
people dont think it is ready.

Richard





More information about the Standards mailing list