[standards-jig] A Proposal to the DTCP/JOBS/PASS madness

Jan Niehusmann jan at gondor.com
Sun Dec 15 17:51:43 UTC 2002

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 11:39:59AM -0700, Dave Smith wrote:
> bare limit. Additionally, my proposal continues to have the advantage 
> that it has fewer states for implementers to keep track of and those 
> states have well-defined parameters. At this point, I believe the 

The number of states is a good point, if it makes it easier to implement
it bug-free.

What I don't like is the binary representation. Jabber uses a clear text
protocol, why make parts of it binary?


More information about the Standards mailing list