[standards-jig] Re: [Foundation] streamlining the JIGs

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Feb 26 20:09:39 UTC 2002


I'm working on a little vote-logger right now in Python. Hopefully it'll
meet some of these needs. I had one in Perl but I decided that re-writing
it in Python would be fun. :|

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
web: http://www.saint-andre.com/

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Dave wrote:

> How about voting via Jabber, to a vote-logging agent?  If we can pull this off, it'll be rather neat :-)
> 
>  - Dave
> 
> 
> Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> > 
> > I would rather see some other system put into place for voting.  The voting
> > on lists is chaotic and requires more work (gathering the comments and what
> > not).  Even time locking the vote on the list is an issue of manual labor,
> > and I would say you're more likely to let late votes and things of that
> > nature slip through the cracks.  A component or website seems much more
> > suited to the job.  If people aren't voting on an issue I think it's a sign
> > of a larger problem and that person should be removed from a voting
> > position.  If you have the power to vote on an issue you need to use it
> > wisely, responsibly, and when the vote is called for.
> > 
> > --temas
> > 
> > P.S. - I'm posting this ignoring all of the identity and authorization
> > issues in a good voting system.
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Iain Shigeoka" <iainshigeoka at yahoo.com>
> > To: "Jabber standards" <standards-jig at jabber.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [standards-jig] Re: [Foundation] streamlining the JIGs
> > 
> > 
> > > On 2/26/02 1:44 AM, "Benoit Orihuela" <orihuela at free.fr> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >> We've got 3 votes (2 for looser, 1 for tighter).  My primary concern is
> > the
> > > >> fact that we've only got 3 votes on the issue.
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure a mailing list is a good place for voting ? I don't want to
> > > > receive
> > > > hundreds of mails with a wonderful body like '+1' or '-1' ...  (and I
> > think
> > > > that's why only the 3 people that wanted to add something voted and not
> > > > others).
> > >
> > > From my experience it is the only reliable way to do it in an open source
> > > community.  I've tried web voting and separate voting mailing lists and
> > both
> > > suffer from the problem that most people may know of them, but never use
> > > them.  A vote in the main mailing list sort of shoves the vote into your
> > > face so its hard to forget/ignore.  Even if you ignore or accidentally
> > > delete the announcement, you'll see the votes and after a few days of
> > seeing
> > > them (and opinions on  why its +1 you're more likely to throw your own
> > vote
> > > in...  :)  Of course, I'm always open to new suggestions.
> > >
> > > -iain
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 




More information about the Standards mailing list