[standards-jig] Message Body rendering conformance.

Shawn Wilton shawn at black9.net
Sun Jan 20 06:08:02 UTC 2002

Gah, someone told me to send it here.  :-(

But I'm not talking about an extension.  This would be how you render the
body, now how it's formatted.

-----Original Message-----
From: standards-jig-admin at jabber.org
[mailto:standards-jig-admin at jabber.org]On Behalf Of Julian Missig
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 10:09 PM
To: standards-jig at jabber.org
Subject: Re: [standards-jig] Message Body rendering conformance.

This should probably go to the Fomatting JIG ;) - But it's perfectly
possible to make another extension if you don't like the XHTML one.


Shawn Wilton wrote:
> Hey howdy.  I had an idea and wanted to put it before
> the big shots.  They told me to send it here.  ;-)
> So the idea is this.  We have a problem right now
> with how clients handle the rendering/formatting of
> the message body.  Now I know about the xhtml spec and
> this has *nothing* to do with that.  If you want bold,
> italicism, etc. then you should use the xhtml.  No,
> what I'm talking about are things like the irc tags
> and emoticons.  Now when I go to use the aim or the
> msn system, etc. then I get a consist look and feel
> in the formatting of a message.  I know what the other
> person is going to see when i send them something.
> Unfortunately we do not yet have this sort of
> congruence in jabber and I think this only hurts us.
> Here's what I propose:
> We need a system.  A system that clients can implement
> that gives all of us a similar format to work with.
> 1.  We need emoticons.  These should be smileys, winks,
>     etc. and they need to be free (BSD lisenced icons).
>     For these emoticons we also need standard maps
>     from text -> graphic that people can use in their
>     clients.
> 2.  We need a standard list of irc like tags.  As it
>     stands, almost all clients implement /me for example.
>     I would also propose others for standard convenience.
>     /c for close, /subject for a subject change, and
>     anything else people can think of.
> Now this would all be optional of course since we can't
> and don't want to force people to use a system they
> don't care for.  But atleast then we have set of standards
> and free for use icons to work off of.
> I don't know, lmk what you think.

Standards-JIG mailing list
Standards-JIG at jabber.org

More information about the Standards mailing list