[standards-jig] Serious Issues with JEP 0024
theo at theoretic.com
Fri Jul 19 20:33:12 UTC 2002
DJ Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:46:17AM -0400, Adam Theo wrote:
>>OK, Here's my full idea for a better pubsub protocol.
> I wrote the previous mail (suggesting a new JEP for this) before
> reading this post :-) - would you like to write this up as a JEP;
> do you think it's worth it?
Hm... yes, I think it is work it. And probably the best idea since it
does seem our two ideas are not compatible after all (to nobody's
fault). Then take it from there, I guess. Well, on the bright side, it
seems this discussion produces Yet Another PubSub JEP....
Hey, StPeter, could you maybe, say, reserve JEP numbers 0040-0045 for
me? I got a load of 'em coming.... :-)
/\ Adam Theo, Age 23, Tallahassee FL USA
//\\ Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
// \\ (Boycotting AOL, therefore no AIM or ICQ)
// || \\ Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
|| "Building Ideas by Bringing them Together"
|| Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
|| "The Next Generation Communications Protocol"
|| "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American Buddhist"
More information about the Standards