[standards-jig] Serious Issues with JEP 0024

Adam Theo theo at theoretic.com
Fri Jul 19 20:33:12 UTC 2002


DJ Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:46:17AM -0400, Adam Theo wrote:
> 
>>OK, Here's my full idea for a better pubsub protocol.
>>[...]
> 
> 
> I wrote the previous mail (suggesting a new JEP for this) before
> reading this post :-)   - would you like to write this up as a JEP;
> do you think it's worth it?

Hm... yes, I think it is work it. And probably the best idea since it 
does seem our two ideas are not compatible after all (to nobody's 
fault). Then take it from there, I guess. Well, on the bright side, it 
seems this discussion produces Yet Another PubSub JEP....

Hey, StPeter, could you maybe, say, reserve JEP numbers 0040-0045 for 
me? I got a load of 'em coming.... :-)

-- 
     /\  Adam Theo, Age 23, Tallahassee FL USA
    //\\   Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
   //  \\  (Boycotting AOL, therefore no AIM or ICQ)
=//====\\=
//  ||  \\  Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
     ||         "Building Ideas by Bringing them Together"
     ||      Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
     ||         "The Next Generation Communications Protocol"
     ||  "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American Buddhist"




More information about the Standards mailing list