[standards-jig] JEP-0001 suggested change

Jeremie jeremie at jabber.org
Wed Jul 31 21:14:49 UTC 2002


Since the voting process was originally based on apache's, here's a
description of their current process, and what the +/- 0/1 means, or an
outright veto (represented by our current -1):

http://apr.apache.org/guidelines.html

Jer

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, David Waite wrote:

> Just remove 0.
> 
> -David Waite
> 
> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> 
> >If we are considering changes to JEP-0001, what about a change to the voting
> >process, so that a JEP only passes if a majority of the council votes +1.
> >Today, if everyone votes 0, the JEP still passes.  -1 could still be a veto.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 




More information about the Standards mailing list