[standards-jig] JEP-0001 suggested change
jeremie at jabber.org
Wed Jul 31 21:14:49 UTC 2002
Since the voting process was originally based on apache's, here's a
description of their current process, and what the +/- 0/1 means, or an
outright veto (represented by our current -1):
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, David Waite wrote:
> Just remove 0.
> -David Waite
> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> >If we are considering changes to JEP-0001, what about a change to the voting
> >process, so that a JEP only passes if a majority of the council votes +1.
> >Today, if everyone votes 0, the JEP still passes. -1 could still be a veto.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards