[standards-jig] JEP-0001 suggested change

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jul 31 21:24:19 UTC 2002


Cool, they have +0 and -0! :)

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jeremie wrote:

> Since the voting process was originally based on apache's, here's a
> description of their current process, and what the +/- 0/1 means, or an
> outright veto (represented by our current -1):
> 
> http://apr.apache.org/guidelines.html
> 
> Jer
> 
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, David Waite wrote:
> 
> > Just remove 0.
> > 
> > -David Waite
> > 
> > Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> > 
> > >If we are considering changes to JEP-0001, what about a change to the voting
> > >process, so that a JEP only passes if a majority of the council votes +1.
> > >Today, if everyone votes 0, the JEP still passes.  -1 could still be a veto.
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 




More information about the Standards mailing list