[standards-jig] Thoughts on JEP-0025

Mike Lin mlin at mlin.net
Mon Jun 10 02:53:56 UTC 2002

I would like to ask you to see if you can use the JEP-0020 Feature
Negotiation syntax for the HTTP Polling negotiation handshaking. I am
very interested to have feedback on how it does or does not meet your
requirements before voting on JEP-0020 as a Standards Track JEP in the


On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 05:55, M.Kiesel wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> >> What if the admin wants to accept any hosts?- I would suggest either to
> >> provide no host list (= any destination host permitted) or to provide a
> >> list (without attributes, this just requires an additional look-up...?).
> > When do you think an admin could want to allow this? It would be
> > something like an open SOCKS server.
> At least allowing to connect to any Jabber server (to any host, port 5222)
> may make sense.
> However, overall your proposal looks fine. What to do next?- I'd propose
> doing a proof-of-concept implementation and then setting up a standards
> track JEP...?
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list