[standards-jig] Re: [Foundation] streamlining the JIGs

Iain Shigeoka iainshigeoka at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 2 01:50:48 UTC 2002

On 3/1/02 4:32 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Jeremie wrote:
>> So I'm +1 for grunting ;-)
> I'm with jer. Let's crank out some more JEPs (and code) just as we've been
> doing. We can always add more structure later if necessary, but right now
> I just don't see the need for tiger teams and such (which seem to me like
> JIGs by another name).

I'm willing to try it.  However it may be worthwhile to have some objective
way to gauge whether its working or not.  :)  The problem with less
structure is usually that its hard to know if its failing because you have
to throw out metrics with process...


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

More information about the Standards mailing list