[standards-jig] [jepnews] JEP-0020: Client Feature Negotiation

Iain Shigeoka iainshigeoka at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 2 01:52:08 UTC 2002

On 3/1/02 2:25 PM, "David Waite" <mass at akuma.org> wrote:

> Iain Shigeoka wrote:
>> On 3/1/02 11:13 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
>>>> Could we just slap JEP0020 within <x> and make it work?
>>> I disagree. The request and response of feature negotiation seems like a
>>> natural use of IQ, not <x/> elements sent in a message or presence.
>> I was thinking <x> within <iq> (in particular browse).
> In this case, we need a way of choosing what type of information we want
> returned via this grand unified namespace known as browse. We already
> need it somewhat, but if even more functionality is going to be rolled
> into browse, we desparately need it.
> (And yes - I still really dislike browse, because it already contains so
> much functionality, but exposed in a very specialized way.)

I can wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment.  To avoid reinventing the
wheel, what about using UDDI or some other existing XML lookup standard?
Has that been discussed?


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

More information about the Standards mailing list